Creative writing 101

September 4, 2010 by Steven W. Beattie · Leave a Comment 

Prof.: Michael Winter

Today’s Lesson: How to tighten up your scenes

The ghost in the machine

September 4, 2010 by Steven W. Beattie · 1 Comment 

Ghosted. Shaughessy Bishop-Stall; $32.00 cloth 978-0-679-31452-3, 394 pp., Random House Canada

Literary spirits – dead and living – haunt Shaughessy Bishop-Stall’s first novel. Charles Bukowski, Hubert Selby, Jr., Bret Easton Ellis, Chuck Palahniuk: echoes of each can be detected at various points throughout Ghosted, a potent story about addiction and despair that takes an unfortunate left-turn about two-thirds of the way through and never quite gets back on track.

The novel focuses on Mason Dubisee, an alcoholic, gambling addicted would-be writer who finds himself getting ever deeper in debt to his old friend Chaz, a small-time drug dealer and hoodlum. Chaz sets Mason up in an apartment, gives him money for life’s basic necessities – food, shaving equipment, and rivers of whiskey – and gets him a job as the Dogfather, a vendor selling hot dogs out of a cart called the Dogmobile: “It’s like a state-of-the-art pseudo-mafioso hotdog stand kind of thing.” It is here that Mason meets Warren, a computer programmer who has fallen in love and who offers Mason $5,000 to ghostwrite a love letter for him. Mason complies, but no sooner has he completed the assignment than Warren turns up dead. At his funeral, Warren’s sister reads Mason’s letter, which was found on his desk, and has morphed from a love missive into a suicide note.

Having struggled unsuccessfully for five years to write a novel, Mason recognizes an opportunity to put his skills as a writer to good use and simultaneously make enough money to pay down his mounting debt to Chaz. In short order, Mason has posted an advertisement online offering his services to despairing souls who plan to kill themselves and want a lovingly crafted testimonial to leave behind. Needless to say, Mason finds no shortage of people willing to pony up the cash.

All of this is narrated briskly, using a limited third-person perspective and incorporating all manner of meta-textual devices, from e-mails to notes for Mason’s failed novel to random Socratic statements from a therapist’s questionnaire (“I’d rather fold a napkin (or tablecloth) than unfold one”; “I’d rather build a bridge than write a song”). Throughout, Bishop-Stall evinces a clear eye for the city of Toronto and its often listless and wayward inhabitants:

There was a small park in the middle of Kensington Market that reminded him of Richard Scarry’s Busytown – every kind of folk doing every kind of thing – mohawked punks playing guitar, old Chinese women doing tai chi, a man on a unicycle being chased by small children, a circle of fishmongers smoking from a hookah, painters with their easels and watercolours, young Wiccans with their sticks and stones, people writing in notebooks, readers reading, singers singing, dealers dealing, drummers drumming, drinkers drinking – all together in the same small frame.

The language here has a jazzy rhythm to it, and the portrait of the city is vibrant and immediate. This is not a surprise from Bishop-Stall, whose first book, Down to This, chronicled the year the author spent living in Toronto’s notorious tent city. His affection for the homeless, mentally ill, and dispossessed is evident throughout Ghosted, and his descriptions of the people who inhabit The Cave, Chaz’s underground boozecan, have a kind of Ellroyesque quality about them:

The poker table was full – a blue, green and black monster in the centre of the felt, tumbling stacks, cards snapping, thick lines of coke on metal discs, cigarette packs, forearms with fresh tattoos still leaking blood, a card burning then turning to the river.

In all corners the shadows were full: skids, capos, trannies, nannies, boxers, traders, waiters, goths, hookers, dealers, doctors, DJs, addicts, assholes, dentists and debt collectors – Chaz’s patrons, getting blasted in the early morning.

Nor is the book devoid of humour, albeit of an extraordinarily dark hue. (Variations on Mason’s Internet ad include “So life ain’t worth living? And your writing skills suck?” and “The grey skies may never be clear, but at least your letter should be.”) And Bishop-Stall proves adept at pacing and at keeping a number of narrative balls in the air simultaneously.

Unfortunately, the author wants his protagonist to be redeemed, and his chosen method for effecting this is introducing a character who is even worse than Mason: more heinous, more callous, more reprehensible. Enter Seth Handyman, a sociopathic pedophile who discovers Mason’s online solicitation, setting the two of them on a collision course. It is with Seth’s introduction that the novel ceases to be a dark urban satire and dons the mantle of a thriller. Seth gives Mason the notebook that his therapist has ordered him to keep, in which he details a prison scalping and the abduction and rape of an eight-year-old girl, among other atrocities. None of this material is gratuitous, in the sense that it is all essential to the novel’s plot, but neither is it comfortable reading: Bishop-Stall’s relentlessly dark milieu – frequently reminiscent of the urban horrorscapes of Bret Easton Ellis – is not for everyone.

But the real problem with the novel’s final stages is the shift in emphasis away from postmodern satire to a more conventional chase narrative. There’s even the de rigueur imperilled love interest (who, in one of the novel’s most jarring moments, takes over the narrative point-of-view from Mason for two pages, before the perspective switches back again precipitously). This retreat into convention is disappointing in a novel that flouts convention so assiduously in its first half. And the various plot strands come together a bit too neatly to be entirely satisfying: in this sense, as well as in its Toronto setting, Ghosted bears a resemblance to Alissa York’s novel Fauna (both York and Bishop-Stall teach creative writing at the University of Toronto’s School of Continuing Studies).

“Anti-hero is a lot easier than hero,” Chaz tells Mason. Perhaps, but its also often more interesting. Mason’s transformation from a self-destructive, self-absorbed reprobate into a heroic figure arguably provides a kind of catharsis, but his redemption just doesn’t ring true. Shaughnessy Bishop-Stall knows darkness well, and has the literary skills to dramatize it. Would that he also had the confidence to see his vision through to its extreme, uncompromised end.

I want to be on a train somewhere, going to meet a lover, reading a paperback copy of Winterson and crying

September 1, 2010 by Steven W. Beattie · 1 Comment 

Jaime Woo had an idea to get a group of people with similar interests together over drinks and record their conversation. The project, called “Overheard,” is meant to capture unedited, unscripted ideas and passionate engagement around a specific topic. For his first podcast, he recorded novelist Stacey May Fowles, blogger and author Julie Wilson, and yr. humble correspondent talking about publishing, CanLit, the influence of new media, and Seth Godin’s disavowal of traditional books. The results are online, for anyone who is interested.

What no one has mentioned yet: UPDATED

August 25, 2010 by Steven W. Beattie · 49 Comments 

The second half of Alex Good’s and my Afterword piece is up, this time focusing on writers we feel have been unjustly neglected:

We chose also to focus on underrated authors because it’s important to bear in mind that there is a huge wealth of worthwhile literature being written in this country. Unfortunately, the vast majority of it flies under the radar due to limited marketing budgets, the increasingly poisonous blockbuster mentality that is infecting publishing, and an overwhelming number of books being published. With such a deluge of material, consumers need guidance; where better to look than award winners and well-regarded books? But, the overinflation of certain reputations tends to crowd out others that are equally (if not infinitely more) worthy of attention.

With one exception, the authors on this list don’t have the same recognition factor as those on the previous list (and the one exception is notorious for all the wrong reasons). However, while they are heterogeneous in style, subject, and approach, they share in common a vivacity and willingness to push the boundaries of language and form. And they make reading a joy, not a chore, which is something sorely lacking from much of our fiction these days.

As with the first half, the criticisms came fast and furious. The authors are all old(er). Many of them were discovered and/or edited by John Metcalf. There are no French Canadians. Many of them have appeared in Canadian Notes and Queries, a publication with which both Good and I are associated (which would kind of indicate that we admire them already, but never mind).

All perfectly true, but what strikes me – as struck me with the (much more predictable) criticisms yesterday – is that none of these things have anything to do with the books themselves. No one is suggesting that Ray Smith or Diane Schoemperlen are not proficient writers. No, it’s that they’re too old. Or too white. Or not French Canadian. All of which completely misses the point.

Yes, some of the writers are of a certain age. It strikes me that the older and more prolific a good writer gets without achieving recognition, the more claim that person has to being underrated. Yes, many of the writers on the list have been edited by John Metcalf. This only goes to prove how essential he has been in discovering the finest literary talent this country has seen in the past 40 years. It never ceases to amaze me that people want to attack him for this. He should be praised, not vilified. (And, on the subject of proving André Alexis correct, which is another criticism that has been lobbed at us, I would point out that Alexis was writing about Metcalf the critic, not Metcalf the editor.)

But the bottom line is that when we set out to create this list, we really didn’t take into consideration anything other than the quality of a given author’s writing. Call us crazy. We did not set out to make a political statement, to keep or lose friends (although that may indeed be an unintended consequence of this little endeavour), or to boost egos. We set out to highlight what we authentically feel is some of the best and least heralded writing in this country. The fact that no one is commenting on the writing itself is indicative of how unfamiliar it actually is, which kind of proves our point.

UPDATE: Over at Sans Everything, Jeet Heer (one of the best literary critics this country has) makes a very good point:

I think the accolade “underrated” should more properly given to writers who have composed excellent stories and novels but whose names are unknown even to most readers of quality literature. I’m thinking here of K.D. Miller, Mike Barnes, Mary Borsky, Cynthia Flood, Ann Copeland, and Terry Griggs. They’ve all written first rate fiction, yet their names barely register in literary discussions. Any list of underrated Canadian writers should include them. If I were doing the list, I would have taken out writers like Smith and Glover, who are superb but get widely reviewed and discussed, to make room for K.D. Miller and company.

I (we?) stand by the inclusion of Smith and Glover, but nevertheless acknowledge the fact that the list of underrated Canadian writers could, conceivably, go on and on.

Salty Ink wanders into the fray

August 25, 2010 by Steven W. Beattie · Leave a Comment 

Chad Pelley, the proprietor of the Salty Ink blog, has posted a thoughtful response to yesterday’s Afterword piece on overrated Canadian authors.

Sure, their article was harsh, and glossed over the fact that “good literature” is subjective — Ondaatje is brilliant to some and densely impenetrable to others, but those others should be able to say so, without repercussion, shouldn’t they? The point of all of this hoopla over one article is this: No one loses it over a critic calling an established writer subpar unless that writer is someone like Ondaatje. If his next book is crap his next book is crap, and a critic would say so about anyone else. If you grant an iconic writer immunity from criticism it is a disservice to what CanLit is, because what it is to me is a fresh, crisp, ever-evolving thing. But not if we are buying and awarding names over books. Not even when the author earned their reputation, because people in every profession know when to retire, and, a writer without a thick skin is in the wrong profession anyway. And, a writer who thinks s/he is great, too great for criticism, is done evolving and getting better. And is therefore done.

Amen, brother. Amen.

Burning bridges

August 24, 2010 by Steven W. Beattie · 5 Comments 

If my Twitter feed is any indication, most of you will already have seen the list that Alex Good and I prepared for the National Post, in which we identify what we feel to be 10 overrated Canadian authors. This will be followed up tomorrow with a list of 10 underrated authors (which is much nicer, I promise).

In case you missed it:

Western literature has always resembled a Family Compact: those on the outside clamour for entry, and those on the inside guard their privilege assiduously. The flipside of the literary parlour game debating who’s in and who’s out involves making up gripers’ lists of who’s outside but should be in, and what undeserving insiders should be expelled. A recent Huffington Post essay by Anis Shivani outing America’s 15 most overrated authors is only the latest example of this popular pastime. Only a week earlier Gabriel Josipivici published a similar piece in the Guardian attacking as overinflated the reputations of Amis, Barnes, McEwan, and Rushdie. In the wake of all the fuss – both essays raised a storm of interest online – subjecting the Canadian scene to the same critical scrutiny became a point of national pride.

Always willing to rush in where angels fear to tread, we have accepted this challenge.

The list itself is up on The Afterword.

The responses so far have run the gamut from laudatory to condemnatory to those calling for our scalps. Although the practice of list-making is something of a foolish pastime, and this kind of thumbs-up/thumbs-down format eschews critical nuance, I do believe that the process is a valuable reconsideration of our literary landscape. Canada has a huge wealth of literary talent, and unfortunately that talent often goes wanting for the attention of readers because the blockbuster mentality and marketing behemoths powering a few anointed books crowd everything else out. If there is one message I’d like readers to take away from our lists, it’s this: there is infinitely more good writing in this country than bad. We restricted ourselves to 10 names for each list. If we wanted to, we could have made tomorrow’s list much, much longer.

There’s enough CG in this film to qualify it for Best Animated Feature

August 21, 2010 by Steven W. Beattie · Leave a Comment 

The ironic thing is that this promo video is infinitely more entertaining than the movie itself.

Piranha 3D: For Your Consideration from Piranha 3D

R.I.P. Frank Kermode

August 18, 2010 by Steven W. Beattie · Leave a Comment 

One of the greatest and most influential critics ever to grace the stage of English Literature, Frank Kermode has died at the age of 90. From the Guardian:

Prominent in literary criticism since the 1950s, Kermode held “virtually every endowed chair worth having in the British Isles,” according to his former colleague John Sutherland, from King Edward VII professor of English literature at Cambridge to Lord Northcliffe professor of modern English literature at University College London and professor of poetry at Harvard, along with honorary doctorates from universities around the world. He was knighted in 1991.

A renowned Shakespearean, publishing Shakespeare’s Language in 2001, Kermode’s books range from works on Spenser and Donne and the memoir Not Entitled to last year’s Concerning E.M. Forster.

Equally conversant with the work of Shakespeare and Wallace Stevens, Kermode’s 2006 book The Sense of an Ending has become an essential text for students of literary criticism, and literature itself.

It is the constant presence of more or less subtle varieties of apocalyptism that makes possible the repetitive claims for uniqueness and privilege in modernist theorising about the arts. So far as I can see these claims are unjustified. The price to be paid for old-style talk about “evolving sensibility” is new-style talk about “mutation.” It is only rarely that one can say there is nothing to worry about, but in this limited respect there appears not to be. Mr. Fiedler professes alarm at the prospect of being a stranded humanist, wandering among unreadable books in a totally new world. But when sensibility had evolved that far there will be no language and no concept of form, so no books. Its possessors will all be idiots. However, it will take more than jokes, dice, random shuffling, and smoking pot to achieve this, and in fact very few people seem to be trying. Neo-modernists have examined in many ways (many more than I have talked about), various implications of traditional modernism. As a consequence, we have, not unusually, some good things, many trivial things, many jokes, much nonsense. Among other things they enable us to see more clearly that certain aspects of earlier modernism really were so revolutionary that we ought not to expect – even with everything so speeded up – to have the pains and pleasures of another comparable movement quite so soon. And by exaggerating and drawing, the neo-modernist does help us to understand rather better what the Modern now is, and has been during this century.

– “Objects, Jokes, and Art,” 1966

The more things change

August 17, 2010 by Steven W. Beattie · 18 Comments 

I can’t see that this novel will do well at all. It’s really too quaint. It’s not great enough or profound enough to transcend its own familiar weariness as a story of a gawky young farm boy’s struggle to distinguish between goodness and evil and his growth from that experience. Ross is either making a genuine effort to revive a played-out genre or he is more hopelessly out of touch with reality than I can believe. This has a strong whiff of the urban novel of the thirties about it. Its uncomplicated innocence and serious tone by way of James Farrell; its theatricality most evident in the characters of Charley and Mad by way of the gangster movies, its excessive naturalism (“we had pork chops and chocolate pie”); and its sentimental ending; all this is reminiscent of another time.

– Richard B. Wright, from a reader’s report on Whir of Gold by Sinclair Ross, dated May 1966

Wright was working for Macmillan when he prepared the reader’s report that contains the above excerpt. (It is reprinted in the new book “Collecting Stamps Would Have Been More Fun”: Canadian Publishing and the Correspondence of Sinclair Ross, 1933–1986.) What strikes me most upon reading it in 2010 is how au courant it all sounds. The phrases Wright uses in his description of Ross’s book – “too quaint”; “familiar weariness”; “uncomplicated innocence”; “serious tone”; “excessive naturalism”; “sentimental ending” – could easily be applied to any number of CanLit novels being published today (including, ironically, Wright’s own).

That rasping sound you hear is CanLit creaking in its own, dessicated skin.

Hidden wildlife

August 10, 2010 by Steven W. Beattie · Leave a Comment 

Fauna. Alissa York; $29.95 cloth 978-0-307-35789-2, 376 pp., Random House Canada.

Predation is a recurring theme in the fiction of Alissa York. Her debut novel, 2002′s Mercy, opens with a cow being slaughtered, and contains scenes involving an owl attack in a bog and a pack of feral dogs. Her follow-up, the Scotiabank Giller Prize–shortlisted 2007 novel Effigy, has at its centre a woman named Dorrie, the fourth wife of the vicious Mormon horse breeder Erasmus Hammer, who dreams she is a crow, circling over scenes of violence and horror:

Being crow, I should make my way back to the killing field. I might have to haunt the margins for a time if the humans are still at work. On my last circuit I winged all the way back to the circled wagons. Between here and there, the dog man’s pack hunkered over the dead. They were stripping the bodies, revealing even the blue-white underskins of their feet. One yanked a glitter-string from a female’s wrist. One plucked shimmer-discs from an overskin he’d peeled away. The crow eye sparked and buzzed.

The impressionistic scene being described is that of the Mountain Meadows Massacre, an 1857 slaughter of a wagon train by a group of Utah Mormons and Paiute natives. Witnessing the grisly tableau from her crow’s-eye view, Dorrie imagines the relationship between the natural predation of the wild and the more vicious human kind:

See how the humans cache their kill, how they bow and scrape, swinging their heavy tools. Soon shallow patches have been scratched, and the dragging of bodies begins. Like weasels hoarding mice, they pile dead upon dead, dusting them with not enough earth to dissuade a fox kit. Some do even less, dumping corpses in gullies and concealing them with clumps of grass.

In her waking hours, Dorrie is much prized by her husband for her skill as a taxidermist; she takes the animals that Erasmus kills for sport and returns them to a lifelike state. At the novel’s opening, Erasmus brings Dorrie the bodies of a family of wolves he has killed. As the book progresses, a recurring leitmotif is the presence of a lone wolf scouring the Hammer homestead, trying to locate his lost pack.

The uneasy relationship between wildlife and the humans who prey on it reasserts itself in York’s latest novel, Fauna. The setting has shifted from 19th-century Utah to present-day Toronto, and in place of Erasmus there is Darius, a troubled young man who, calling himself “Coyote Cop,” blogs about what he perceives to be the scourge of the city’s coyote population. His blog posts, which become ever more violent and provocative, attract the attention of Stephen, an ex-soldier who suffered a heart virus while on a tour of duty in Afghanistan. Stephen’s medical condition cut short his military service; he now spends his days working at Howell Auto Wreckers, a wrecking yard in the Don Valley ravine that does double duty as an ad hoc animal sanctuary.

The sanctuary serves as the gathering point for the book’s cast of human misfits: in addition to Stephen and Guy, who owns the property, there is Edal, a federal wildlife officer currently on stress leave; Lily, a homeless girl who prowls the city at night rescuing birds that have flown into the lighted buildings of the downtown core; and Kate, a worker at the Annex Canine Rehabilitation Centre.

Each of the characters bears a wound or an absence of some sort. Some wounds, like Stephen’s defective heart, are physical; others are emotional; still others, a combination of the two. Lily cuts herself to mark the days she’s been on the streets: “Tonight being her fifty-seventh night of freedom, she’s partway into a group of five. The fifth cuts are the tricky ones, slashing down across the previous four. They require a deeper breath, an extra-steady hand.” Kate is trying to recover from the death of her lover, Lou-Lou, from “a massive brain aneurysm.” Since Lou-Lou’s death, Kate, who had never been able to confess the true nature of her relationship to her conservative parents, “had entered an underwater world,” where she “was walking, sitting, lying on the ocean floor.” Kate and Lily find solace with each other, impelled by their mutual love of dogs.

The character with the most shattering home life is Darius, whose troubled mother Faye dies after a fall in the bathtub, leaving him in the custody of his grandmother and his religious zealot grandfather, who insists that an extra place be set at the dinner table for the Son of God: “Every time Grandmother stood up to clear, she took Jesus’s full plate first, carrying it in both hands and tipping the untouched portion into the garbage pail. It hardly seemed fair, given that Darius had to eat every scrap he was served.” Darius’s grandfather’s spine is defective and he needs his wife to tie a board to his back in order to stand straight, something Darius witnesses one night when he gets up to go to the bathroom.

The grandfather’s peculiar affliction and his obsession with Jesus recall the Southern grotesques of Flannery O’Connor, a writer York acknowledges as an influence on her own work. But the grandfather – who keeps a spare belt on hand for the specific purpose of beating his wife and grandson – is one of the few O’Connoresque characters in Fauna; unlike York’s previous two novels, the element of Southern Gothicism is downplayed here. This is not to suggest that Fauna is by any stretch ordinary: on the contrary, with its band of forgotten misfits, its setting in the literal hidden valleys of Toronto, and sections that are narrated from the perspective of various animals (foxes, skunks, coyotes), Fauna is passing strange, and all the more bracing because of it. Although it invokes classics of animal lore – among them The Jungle Book, Watership Down, and Wild Animals I Have Known – it is startlingly original in its approach and its execution.

York’s writing, as always, is pristine, and over the course of three novels she has developed an admirable ability to juggle multiple perspectives and plotlines. However, the novel’s resolution is too neat to be entirely satisfying. The various storylines come to conclusions that are too tidy, and when the reason for Darius’s antipathy toward coyotes finally becomes apparent, the psychology involved is too simple to be entirely credible. Moreover, a number of characters – a stripper Stephen chances upon in the park one day, the restaurateur who gives Lily a job as a “dish pig” – appear in the novel fleetingly, only to vanish again without any payoff.

Still, Fauna represents a simultaneous extension of recurring themes and an intriguing departure for York. It is structurally ambitious and the author displays a tight control over her language and patterns of metaphor. The novel falters in its final stages, but that in no way diminishes the general enjoyment the story offers. York has written a truly odd book; it is a testament to her skill as a writer that it works as well as it does.

Next Page »