Howard Jacobson wins the 2010 Man Booker Prize

October 12, 2010 by · 5 Comments 

This past weekend, Howard Jacobson published an article in the Guardian bemoaning the lack of attention comic novels receive among literary critics and readers of “serious” literature:

The novel was born of restless critical intelligence, and it was born laughing. “It pleases me to think,” said Milan Kundera, in the course of accepting the Jerusalem prize for literature in 1985, “that the art of the novel came into the world as an echo of God’s laughter.” If this is so, then talk of the comic novel is tautologous. If we are to be true to the form there will be only “novels” and they will be effusive with wit and humour; thereafter, to help the bookshops categorise, we can allow all the sub-species they have shelf-space for – the novel of distended plot and fatuous denouement, the novel of who cares who dunnit, the novel of what Orwell in his great defence of Henry Miller called “flat cautious statements and snack-bar dialects,” the novel, to sum up, of anorexic mirthlessness. But let’s not forget that those are the anomalies.


As if to lend credence to Jacobson’s analysis, the Man Booker Prize jury, chaired by poet Andrew Motion, awarded The Finkler Question this year’s £50,000 honour, trumping the heavily favoured C by Tom McCarthy, and such heavy hitters as Room by Emma Donoghue and Parrot and Olivier in America by two-time Booker winner Peter Carey.

The Finkler Question is being touted as the first comic novel to win the award, which is not entirely true: DBC Pierre’s Vernon God Little is technically a satire, but it could be argued that the 2003 Booker winner is a comic novel (the distinction between satire and comedy is razor thin). Still, it’s nice to see a book that is not utterly morose and sombre walk away with a major literary award.

Of course, the second-guessing has already begun. On the Guardian‘s blog, Sarah Crown writes:

I – like quite a few others, if the comments on the books blogs are anything to go by – preferred [Jacobson’s] 2006 novel Kalooki Nights; it’s difficult to shake the faint sense that tonight’s prize is somewhat in the nature of a lifetime achievement award.

Nevertheless, Jacobson’s win is a validation of Flannery O’Connor’s assertion in the introduction to the second edition of her debut novel, Wise Blood: “It is a comic novel … and as such, very serious, for all comic novels that are any good must be about matters of life and death.”

It would appear that this year’s Man Booker Prize jury agrees.


5 Responses to “Howard Jacobson wins the 2010 Man Booker Prize”
  1. October is Flannery O’Connor Month!

  2. Brian Palmu says:

    I haven’t read any of the books competing for the Booker. Nevertheless, the story pleases me.

    And O’Connor’s comment is typically wise. It reminds me of Ralph Gustafson’s similar declaration that a lot of so-called light, whimsical, or comic verse is similarly serious in intent and aftereffect.

  3. Kerry Clare says:

    Just a note– though I don’t think Donoghue’s book had depth enough to take the win, it was– surprisingly– anything but morose and sombre.

  4. Mark Sampson says:

    For a taste of Jacobson’s humour in action, you might want to check out this article. I especially like his quip about his wife laughing at other men’s books:

  5. Nathan says:

    “The Finkler Question is being touted as the first comic novel to win the award…”

    How quickly they forget The Old Devils.